Why Not Praise Christ and Muḥammad: 'Abdu'l-Bahá at Temple Emanu-El
Mírzá Maḥmúd-i-Zarqání, Mahmúd's Diary: The Diary of Mírzá Maḥmúd-i-Zarqání, (1998), George Ronald
Studio narration for this story is coming — it’ll be generated by the cloud-TTS pipeline (voice: auto-selected from the source author).
When in Bahá'í history
San Francisco (today: San Francisco, California, USA)
On Saturday, October 12, 1912, ‘Abdu’l-Bahá entered the Sutter Street sanctuary of Temple Emanu-El in San Francisco — the largest Reform synagogue on the Pacific coast. The audience that afternoon, Mírzá Maḥmúd records, numbered approximately 2,000. The rabbis and elders of the city had invited Him as a guest of honour and a friend of the Jewish people. They had not, perhaps, expected the talk He would give.
The Master began by honouring Moses. The foundation of the religion of God laid by Moses, He said, was the cause of eternal honour for the children of Israel. Without that foundation, much of what Christianity and Islam later professed would not have been possible. The world owed Israel a debt that could not be repaid.
He then turned the question.
Why should not the children of Israel praise now Christ and Muḥammad?
It was a question respectful in its grammar and devastating in its content. He laid out the case as gently as the room allowed: that Christ had spread the name of Moses across continents, and Muḥammad had carried it across oceans, and that in honouring either Christ or Muḥammad the Jewish community would be honouring the very vindication of Moses’s long ministry.
He pressed the larger principle:
The foundation of the religion of God which was laid by Moses was the cause of eternal honor.
To stand by that foundation was to recognise its growth. The age, He said, was not the age of fanaticism; it was the age of science, in which every claim could be tested and every inheritance examined.
This century is the century of science... Does it behoove us to linger in our fanaticism?
The talk did not flatter and it did not insult. It treated the audience as scholars capable of considering its argument on its merits. Mahmúd’s Diary records that when the Master had finished, many in the audience pressed forward to thank Him. Some who had come hostile, the diary notes, departed thoughtful.
Paraphrased from Mahmúd's Diary: The Diary of Mírzá Maḥmúd-i-Zarqání (George Ronald, 1998), entry for October 12, 1912; see original for full text.
Discuss this story
Reflection
- The Master poses His difficult question with respect for what the community already venerates. What does that strategy teach about asking hard questions of communities to which we belong?
- "Does it behoove us to linger in our fanaticism?" He places the question to His Jewish hosts, but it lands on every faith. Where does it land for you?
Cite this story
Maḥmúd-i-Zarqání, M.. (1998). *Mahmúd's Diary: The Diary of Mírzá Maḥmúd-i-Zarqání*. George Ronald.
Record yourself reading this story
Recording stays on this device only. Nothing is uploaded.
Related stories
The Hub Awakens: 'Abdu'l-Bahá in Boston
Mahmúd's Diary records 'Abdu'l-Bahá's days in Boston in late July and August 1912, including His talk at the Free Religious Association and the unusually warm reception of Boston's Unitarian ministers. Boston, the city of Emerson and the Transcendentalists, recognised in the Master a kindred root.
On the Lawn at Cambridge: 'Abdu'l-Bahá at Harvard
Mahmúd's Diary records that during the May 1912 visit to Boston, 'Abdu'l-Bahá addressed audiences at Harvard University in Cambridge — including a memorable open-air talk on the lawn before Sanders Theatre when the hall could not accommodate the crowd that had come.
Across the Alleghenies: 'Abdu'l-Bahá in Cleveland and Pittsburgh
Mahmúd's Diary records the spring of 1912 when 'Abdu'l-Bahá travelled west of the Alleghenies for the first time, holding meetings in Cleveland and Pittsburgh and then continuing to Chicago. In Pittsburgh the smoke of the steel mills hung over the talks; in Cleveland the believers gathered in private homes.
Denver: The Master and the Women's Auxiliary
Mahmúd's Diary records a women's gathering arranged in Denver in late September 1912 — a meeting at the home of one of the city's prominent suffragists, where 'Abdu'l-Bahá spoke of the spiritual basis for the equality of women and men.